
Senior leaders of the INDIA Bloc, including Gaurav Gogoi, MP and President of the Assam Pradesh Congress Committee; Dr. Syed Naseer Hussain, MP and AICC General Secretary in charge of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh; and representatives from several opposition parties, held a media briefing at the Constitution Club of India today.
The press conference addressed what the opposition called serious issues in the voter lists and the loss of trust in the Election Commission of India (ECI).
Opposition Questions Election Commission’s Neutrality
Dr. Syed Naseer Hussain opened the briefing by welcoming journalists and sharing the opposition’s concerns:
“For several days, opposition parties have raised significant questions, both publicly and in Parliament, about the voter list discrepancies. Rahul Gandhi previously presented detailed data showing evidence of large-scale manipulation. We expected the Election Commission to clear up these issues with honesty. Instead, what we saw yesterday was a press conference that only increased doubts about the Commission’s fairness.”
He added that constitutional and independent bodies in India have faced undue pressure from the ruling government over the last decade. “The Election Commission seems compromised now,” Hussain said, noting that leaders from eight opposition parties were present to address the ECI’s statements one by one.
Gaurav Gogoi: “Election Commission Running Away From Accountability”
Gaurav Gogoi emphasized that the right to vote is fundamental to Indian democracy:
“The Election Commission is the constitutional protector of this right. However, when political parties ask important questions, the Commission avoids direct answers and attacks the opposition instead.”
Gogoi pointed out several critical issues the ECI has not addressed:
Why was the State Inquiry Report in Bihar rushed just three months before the elections, without consulting opposition parties?
Why has the Commission not commented on reports that nearly 70 lakh new voters were added to Maharashtra’s rolls between the Lok Sabha and Assembly polls?
Why will CCTV footage from polling booths be deleted after only 45 days?
Why is the Commission hesitant to provide data on 65 lakh deleted voters in a searchable format, despite the Supreme Court’s order?
Why is there opposition to using Aadhaar for voter identity verification?
He also pointed to Rahul Gandhi’s allegations of nearly one lakh bogus voters in Mahadevapura, Karnataka.
“Instead of addressing these serious concerns, the Chief Election Commissioner spoke like a political spokesperson. Officials come and go, but institutions must stand firm. Parliament will witness these actions, and appropriate measures will be taken in due course,” Gogoi warned.
On Impeachment Motion
When asked whether the opposition would pursue an impeachment motion against the Chief Election Commissioner, Gogoi confirmed:
“Yes, the matter was discussed this morning among opposition parties. There is a strong agreement, and we will make the right decision at the appropriate time.”
On District Administrations Dismissing Reports as “False”
In response to a question about district officials calling reports of discrepancies misleading, Gogoi said:
“If everything is fine, why is the Commission afraid of an inquiry? Why avoid scrutiny if there’s nothing to conceal? This is not just about a political party’s rights; it’s about the people’s mandate and protecting democracy. Unfortunately, today, the biggest threat to the Election Commission’s credibility is the Commission itself.”
On CEC’s Statement Targeting Rahul Gandhi
When asked about the CEC’s comment that Rahul Gandhi should either file an affidavit or apologize, Gogoi replied:
“Did he use that tone with Anurag Thakur when he made inflammatory comments? Did he speak that way to journalists who uncovered discrepancies? The Chief Election Commissioner’s language sounded more like a BJP spokesperson than a constitutional authority.”
Naseer Hussain: “Debate Must Take Place in Parliament”
Dr. Naseer Hussain concluded by clarifying the opposition’s stance on the SIR:
“We want discussion, not avoidance. Parliament is the top forum for such debates. Opposition parties have consistently pushed for a detailed conversation in both Houses. Decisions about the need for an SIR, how it should be conducted, and what safeguards are needed should be made after parliamentary debate.”
He added firmly:
“When it comes to protecting the right to vote, opposition parties will go to great lengths. No threats or intimidation from the Election Commission can stop us.”
Broad Opposition Unity
Today’s press conference featured leaders from various INDIA Bloc parties, including the Samajwadi Party, Trinamool Congress, DMK, RJD, Shiv Sena (UBT), AAP, and the Left bloc. Leaders such as Ram Gopal Yadav, Mahua Moitra, T.R. Baalu, Manoj Jha, Arvind Sawant, Sanjay Singh, and John Brittas were also present to show their support.
The united opposition reaffirmed that protecting voter rights and ensuring free and fair elections is their primary goal, warning that ongoing bias from constitutional bodies would be challenged both in Parliament and on the streets.

































